"Exploit" reasons Robin Hood will only be the bomb of the year!

"Exploit" reasons Robin Hood will only be the bomb of the year!

There is a fact that not every movie is "terrible", the success will also be proportional. Van Helsing, Tranformers 4: Age of Extinction; The new Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor or Pacific Rim: Up Rising. There is nothing more than a pile of money to invest in promoting the film and become a bomb no more than no less.

And, it is very likely that Robin Hood 2018 will also follow in the footsteps of the glittering path.

Right from the start of the trailer, Robin Hood got the brick basket from the viewer. Rarely has the film been badly disparaged from the first trailer or poster like that. The poster reveals the iconic Robin Hood, which makes many people skeptical when the hero's shirt is "mechanically woven". They even found a Superdry shirt like the one for Taron Egerton in front of the camera. Not to be confused with Robin Hood, the villain in the movie is questioned. A humorous Twitter user comments, "The medieval fantasy film looks like a war between a rebel farmer group and a new fascist gang."

See more:

• Solo A Star Wars Story putlocker
• Solo A Star Wars Story netflix
• Watch Avengers Infinity War online free hd 2018

1. Robin Hood - The brand is no longer attractive

Robin Hood is a British legend with the marksmanship "hit cypress". He is also famous for the story of the robbers of the rich divided the poor during the dark period of the Middle Ages. With many anecdotes and mysterious embroidering around, Robin Hood quickly became the subject of never-before-forgotten writers and Hollywood producers. But the truth is that the audience has started to get bored with this name.

Almost every year, filmmakers are releasing a work or series related to the character. Robin Hood's latest blockbuster debut eight years ago, costing $ 200 million, has hit the box office despite the presence of A-list actors such as Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Oscar Isaac, ... and the director of Ridley Scott. Everybody's hearty story about the archer and not much excited when a new movie to theaters anymore.

2. The Legend of the Sword (2017)

In recent years, historical films have not been noticed by audiences. The most prominent examples are The Huntsman: Winter's War (2016) and King Arthur: Legend of the Sword last year. Among them, the work on Guy Ritchie and Robin Hood has many interesting similarities.

Both were developed from a British mythology with a new addition to the script. The characters in the movie are quite colorful and do not fit the context of contemporary history. They give the audience the impression that they are watching a fantasy role-playing game on the big screen. And of course, the money is still there when King Arthur: Legend of the Sword makes Warner Bros. Hundreds of millions of dollars.

3. Taron Egerton is not the ticket office

The name Taron Edgerton emerged from the role of Eggsy in the Kingsman series. In fact, the success of the first came primarily from the novelty of filmmaking as well as the pride of Colin Firth. And the sequel to Kingsman: The Golden Circle did not get the expected sales.

Moreover, he has not had a role or any other memorable style. Viewers only remember him as a young actor with a baby face. With Robin Hood, the British actor is not a name that is heavy enough to carry a blockbuster content that is not really good. In addition, the cast of Jamie Foxx, Ben Mendelsohn or Jamie Dornan was not impressed enough to draw audiences to the theater.

See more:

• Jurrasic World: The Fallen Kingdom unleashes a teaser
• The legendary iron man Iron Man worth 7.3 billion suddenly "not wing that fly"

4. Does the manufacturer risk venturing into Otto Bathurst?

Otto Bathurst is a strange name for audiences around the world. Previously, the director only made the series psychological drama series of England as Peaky Blinders or Criminal Justice and Five Days. Putting a blockbuster action of hundreds of millions of dollars into an inexperienced director like Bathurst is a risky decision for the producer?

In fact, Hollywood seems to favor the use of lesser-known directors to act as blockbuster in the case of Kong: Skull Island (2017). Their ego is easier to control and direction as well as pay less than the big names like Steven Spielberg or Ridley Scott, ... But this is also the type of "eat all fall" when the intervention Excessive studio sometimes has "reverse effects". The lesson from The Mummy (2017) is not enough?

It seems Robin Hood's double-counting has been a bad sign. However, we have to wait until November 2 to get the final answer.